Page 127 of 130
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Tall deck
Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 4:13 pm
by audifreakjim
Someone port my project, but only grab the good stuff

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Tall deck
Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 4:20 pm
by 85oceanic
audifreakjim wrote:Someone port my project, but only grab the good stuff

x2!!!
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Tall deck
Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 4:25 pm
by Mcstiff
audifreakjim wrote:Someone port my project, but only grab the good stuff

JIMMY!
Distilling the tech from the chitchat would be sweet!
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Tall deck
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:12 am
by Hank
The new kid put a serious dent in my working schedule, much less my personal project time. I did get a few minutes in this weekend after hours to pull the bottom end apart. All other rods and pistons check out but check out the textbook shear action on the ARPs on the failed rod.


Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Tall deck
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:16 am
by Toph
Congratulations, Hank! On the kid, not the rod lol...That one doesn't look too happy
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:50 pm
by loxxrider
I don't understand how that rod bolt could undergo shear. Any theories?
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:43 pm
by Hank
Problem is a lot of the pieces are not in the motor, and somewhere on the I-215. There is a bit of evidence that points to that shown fastener busting, then bending the other side over and snapping it off as well. Half of the other fastener is still in the other hole as well. I don't have the lower rod cap, which would likely tell a lot.
I dunno, I don't know how much elongation would occur before the fastener would shear in tensile, but that is really the story being told. Maybe several thousand stretches on a bum fastener finally resulted in a shear? A little work hardening?
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:11 pm
by Wheeljack
I think what Chris is getting at is that it can't really be shear failure from a tensile load in this case. Shear failures require the primary causal forces to be parallel to the shear plane. Could be tensile failure, but considering this isn't a high RPM motor, it still leaves questions.
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:17 pm
by Hank
Good call Chris. I knew I was going to be nailed on saying a shear in tensile.
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:24 pm
by Wheeljack
Pssh...semantics, lol.
And looking at those 4 good remaining assemblies, I realized that aside from the 5 cylinder being a superior engine with an unmatched sound...when you kill a hole, you can just sell the pieces to the 4 cylinder guys. But I doubt any of those 4 cylinder guys are going to find someone building a Geo Metro to put the three remaining assemblies into, lol.
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:47 pm
by glibobbo21
lol^^
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 3:16 pm
by Hank
Indeed. This will make a 2.0L 16vt guy VERY happy.
Hank
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 4:42 pm
by chaloux
Hey never say never on the Geo metro build!!!!
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 7:24 pm
by loxxrider
OK good, I am significantly less baffled now

Usually we just refer to failure as failure... although some define failure as the point at which the yield strength is reached rather than when the ultimate tensile strength is reached because when most parts yield, they have by failed by design.
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:37 am
by my2000apb
Wheeljack wrote:Pssh...semantics, lol.
And looking at those 4 good remaining assemblies, I realized that aside from the 5 cylinder being a superior engine with an unmatched sound...when you kill a hole, you can just sell the pieces to the 4 cylinder guys. But I doubt any of those 4 cylinder guys are going to find someone building a Geo Metro to put the three remaining assemblies into, lol.
ahahahahaha
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 11:56 pm
by Hank
A little throwback of the early 2005 URQ days....
http://mswanson.com/~jgreen/hank.mpgMore progress coming soon!
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 2:41 am
by alxdgr8
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 7:54 pm
by EDIGREG
haha i love that video.
"Hank Ira" - Hooligan
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 8:35 pm
by vt10vt
Wow, this just made me realize how long I have been reading your guys' projects and posts such, I remember when that was originally posted. Still enjoying reading it all and occasionally getting to play along!

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:24 pm
by audifreakjim
LMAO, now where's a video of the most recent doughnuts outside Sean's shop?
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:11 pm
by 85oceanic
That video is awesome! Hilarious stuff Hank

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 10:45 am
by Audilard
Nick, you need to post just some raw video of Hank's car (and others). Skip to 2:37 for the crispy cream.
http://vimeo.com/53829190
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:32 am
by AudiSport4000
That videio is awesome. I dont recall seeing that before!
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 10:22 am
by audifreakjim
I am pumped for this year!
Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:43 pm
by 85oceanic
audifreakjim wrote:I am pumped for this year!
So am I! I can't wait!!!