Page 2 of 6

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6 - its alive!

Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 3:41 pm
by JustinB_20vt
So I am really digging the turbo / EM setup. Outside of the turbo band it seems to be peppier than before and spool up is definitely below 4k but i will have to do some more driving / logging to get an idea where. Currently limited to 18 - 19 PSI which feels quick already or could it be i haven't driven it in a few months? :rofl:

Hanks work of art after swain coating.
Image

And putting all the parts in place
Image

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6 - its alive!

Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 3:55 pm
by EDIGREG
Looks awesome Justin...I love my swaintech coating and it has held up perfectly. You will be happy with it.

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6 - its alive!

Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 5:05 pm
by JustinB_20vt
EDIGREG wrote:Looks awesome Justin...I love my swaintech coating and it has held up perfectly. You will be happy with it.


thanks ED... but unfortunately mine seems much thinner than all of the other pics i have seen. While installing i brushed it up against a braided hose and a few areas rubbed off... you can see one in the pic above the BOV. My turbo housing also is incredibly thin in most areas with area's around the flanges being pretty thick. I am going to call them tomorrow to discuss, personally i shouldn't have installed it but since it took them 5 weeks I really wasn't in the mood for installing this all in the 115 degree heat of June

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6 - its alive!

Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 5:56 pm
by Hank
It is pretty thin stuff, but I feel your concern. It looks freaking amazing Justin. Nice car.

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6 - Needs more cowbell

Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 10:08 pm
by JustinB_20vt
Open Season - So now its time to start thinking of fueling (injectors, fuel rail, etc) So far I am thinking
- Convert fuel lines to -6AN
- Fuel Pressure sensor and ford fuel trim sensor back to VEMS.
- Change out lines in the tank/ relay 044 pump
- Unfortunately most of Mance's fuel rail mod pics are no workie so unless someone has the details or the writeup saved.. plz/thx.
- Suggestions for injectors?? goal is 450 at the wheels on E85.
- Adjustable FPR for stock rail or aftermarket if i go with aftermarket rail.

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6 - Needs more cowbell

Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 10:28 am
by Hank
I love the FIC 1000cc injectors for this app. We can supply them along with a plug and play fuel rail for that injector height for an awesome PNP solution.

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6 - Needs more cowbell

Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2013 1:57 pm
by JustinB_20vt
New ignition system is almost complete and FPR mounting location

Image
mounted to the stock tabs for the plastic cover
Image
wiring is fresh and clean .. just need to finish the ecu side connectors
Image

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:00 am
by mushasho
This looks REALLY clean... I like it a lot!

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 2

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 11:03 am
by chaloux
Yeah def jelly. I need a solution like this for my 4k

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:17 am
by EDIGREG
nice!

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 1:53 pm
by 85oceanic
Jeez, this car is so freaking clean. Excellent work man, I love it!

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:27 am
by JustinB_20vt
Halp! So fuel system is done; obligatory pic below. Having issues getting the car idle tuned. Trying to get a decent idle on the FIC 1100cc injectors which i calculated as a req_fuel of 2.69 but that was so lean I had the idle VE blocks around 138 to make stoich :( once i even get to 1.0 lambda the car runs rough and wont idle. Thoughts ????? i tried tuning the req_fuel to get a 1.0 lambda at an idle VE table of ~100 and that took me up to 3.8. ECO correction is off and fuel pressure is 43.5 PSI

Image

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 2:23 am
by themagellan
What FPR are you using?

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 6:51 am
by chaloux
Hmm. Timing numbers in those bottom cells? Go through zeets idle guide. I like to run a little more timing in the bottom left 6 cells, 15 degrees. It helps stabilize idle and doesn't hurt anything.

But there's probably something else going on. You may have to raise the idle rpm with those injectors. They might not like low pulse widths.

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 8:11 am
by WOMBAT
Woah, just stumbled up on this build. Fantastic work Justin! Can't wait to see what this does with a good tune!

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 8:29 am
by JustinB_20vt
themagellan wrote:What FPR are you using?


its an Aeromotive compact adjustable

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 8:48 am
by JustinB_20vt
chaloux wrote:Hmm. Timing numbers in those bottom cells? Go through zeets idle guide. I like to run a little more timing in the bottom left 6 cells, 15 degrees. It helps stabilize idle and doesn't hurt anything.
But there's probably something else going on. You may have to raise the idle rpm with those injectors. They might not like low pulse widths.


I can get it to idle but its much more fuel than the req_fuel calculation for these injectors and seems to get worse as rpms rise. puslewidth at idle is around 1.5ms

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 8:01 pm
by EDIGREG
You should be able to achieve an OE-like idle with those injectors. Can you upload a log for us to look at?

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 8:51 pm
by JustinB_20vt
Hi ED, attached is the log. As it warms up I am having to add quite a bit of fuel even at the req_fuel of 3.0 which these injectors should be 2.7.

It has a random miss to it now so its possible i have fouled the plugs wandering from lean to rich. I also bought another fuel pressure gauge and verified the pressure is set to 3bar and FPR is working correctly.

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:17 am
by highlander69
Looking awesome.

Nice quality work right there.

Cheers,

Craig

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 10:21 am
by EDIGREG
It looks like you may have a vacuum leak, which is why you see the wandering VE/RPM bouncing up and down. Are the injectors fully seated and sealed on the intake manifold?

Keep in mind that req_fuel is simply a scaler/multiplier.

While you "should" be able to set it to anything, I have run into WEIRD issues where setting the req_fuel value according to the VEMS formula basically prevented the car from being tuned via VE. In the screen shot below you can see no matter how much gain was there the ECU would simply not respond to VE input. Changing the req fuel to a different value "magically" solved this. I've only run into this one time, so maybe it was a firmware bug or something. Point being, use whatever req_fuel works for your car.

Image

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 2:26 pm
by JustinB_20vt
EDIGREG wrote:It looks like you may have a vacuum leak, which is why you see the wandering VE/RPM bouncing up and down. Are the injectors fully seated and sealed on the intake manifold?

Keep in mind that req_fuel is simply a scaler/multiplier.

While you "should" be able to set it to anything, I have run into WEIRD issues where setting the req_fuel value according to the VEMS formula basically prevented the car from being tuned via VE. In the screen shot below you can see no matter how much gain was there the ECU would simply not respond to VE input. Changing the req fuel to a different value "magically" solved this. I've only run into this one time, so maybe it was a firmware bug or something. Point being, use whatever req_fuel works for your car.

Image



Thanks ed... I started last night with a req_fuel of 2.8 and it initially ran like a top as the engine warmed up and cold enrichment went away i had to adjust the VE to keep it stoich and ended up in the 130's once warm. Once warm things begin to get difficult to tune (missing, wandering lambda, dying) I am thinking the enrichment for acceleration is not enough as i noticed lambda would go lean during oscillation peaks or when i revved it... I will play around tonight with req_fuel in the mid 3's and test all my vacuum ports. It would be helpful to look a some config setups using these injectors as +700cc is a big jump for me :P will hit up mark once back from vacation

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 3:21 pm
by EDIGREG
Best method IMO is to get the car fully up to temp (make sure you're fully out of warmup), tune the car, then adjust the warmup curve as necessary.

You are never getting out of warmup (not until your coolant reaches 95*C at least). Assuming you have a standard AAN 87* thermostat, you should add a row for 87* (or whatever your minimum temp is once fully warmed up) = 100% enrichment (off). Currently it is scaling 10% enrichment from 80*C to 95*C.

Also, using the settings that were provided with my FIC2150 injectors helped a lot (Injector open time, rampup, voltage compensation, and rampup voltage compensation).

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:44 pm
by PRY4SNO
JustinB_20vt wrote:question for you experienced welders how many tacks should i make on the vband flange to keep it from warping, i have 4 now and am thinking 8 or 16?



Woah.

Late to chime in here, sorry.

More welding is more heat, always remember that. Once it's on there evenly, weld away.

[quote=IPT's Pipe Trades Handbook by Robert A. Lee]When using a spacer wire, the wire should be removed after the first tack is welded. The second tack weld is made on the opposite side from the rest, 180 degrees opposite. The third tack is made 90 degrees from either the first or second tack. Adjust the gap until the openings are equalized, or if one side of the root opening is slightly wider, then the third tack weld should be placed there. Any shrinkage in the third tack weld will even out the root opening space. The fourth tack weld is placed 180 degrees from the third.[/quote]

On small bore piping (<2") three tacks are used, and on large bore piping tacks are spaced at 4"-6" intervals (100mm - 150mm).


EDIT:

Other thing to keep in mind is that the tack should be about 1.5x the diameter of the gap you're running. Otherwise, no more than 1/8".

Re: Justin (bangetek) 1996 UrS6

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:51 pm
by PRY4SNO
Welding procedures aside, your engine bay looks fantastic.

Very interested in details on your turbo inlet pipe.