Aftermarket diverter valves

General automotive discussion
Post Reply
DE80q
Posts: 2572
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:25 am
Location: York PA 17403

Aftermarket diverter valves

Post by DE80q »

With my setup, I have no need for a diverter/bypass/recirc valve, but honestly, the BOV I have is getting kind of annoying. After about 30 minutes of driving, I can't stand it anymore. I'm looking at taking a 4 hour drive in January, and would be nice to not draw so much attention every time I shift as well. I found a stratmosohere for pretty cheap, and was wondering if anyone has run them, and would recommend it, or going with another brand. Let me know what you guys think.
"If you can't find one, make one"

Dallastown, PA
1991 Audi 80 quattro (20vt project)
1991 Audi Coupe Quattro (project: my first 20v)
2007 Mitsubishi Raider(Dakota in disguise)
2019 Chevy Cruze RS hatch (wife's little red sporty car)
Afterthought
Posts: 1249
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 5:43 pm
Location: Bellingham, Wa

Aftermarket diverter valves

Post by Afterthought »

When I was in the B5 world they were all running forge DV’s and many people starting doing back to just the plastic 710N . It’s cheap and does the job. You won’t hear it outside the car but a little from the inside . I guess the reason people were switching is because they felt the plastic ones were faster and worked better , and also the metal ones do require some maintenance - they need to be taken apart and greased To make sure they move freely (removing a diverted is not that hard though)
I have always wondered about the recirculating blowoff valves as opposed to then diverters (is there any difference ?) like the one pictured below . I would love to run one of these but they’re expensive
Image
Noisy Cricket
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH

Re: Aftermarket diverter valves

Post by Noisy Cricket »

Leave your ovaries at home and just run without any kind of bypass valve. It's only there for NVH reasons on OE cars.
Pete, that rallycross guy

'06 Volvo S60 R (Swedish GTR)
'84 RX-7 (bridge ported, fuel injected, way modified dirt buggy)
'86 QSW (MC2 goes here. Eventually.)
'81 RX-7 (restoration project)
'73 RX-3 (poor man's Mk2 Escort)
User avatar
vt10vt
Posts: 1021
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:44 pm
Location: Winooski, VT

Re: Aftermarket diverter valves

Post by vt10vt »

Noisy Cricket wrote:Leave your ovaries at home and just run without any kind of bypass valve. It's only there for NVH reasons on OE cars.

:wtf:
-Shawn C.
2001 S4 6spd Avant blk/blk - stock daily
2002 01E B6 A4 Built FYF, Built 1.8T, HX35 ~330whp
1989 MC-1 200 Avant- MS1 -Gone but will never forget her lessons
1987 5ktq Sedan - Best $500 beater ever
DE80q
Posts: 2572
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:25 am
Location: York PA 17403

Re: Aftermarket diverter valves

Post by DE80q »

Noisy Cricket wrote:Leave your ovaries at home and just run without any kind of bypass valve. It's only there for NVH reasons on OE cars.

:shame:
"If you can't find one, make one"

Dallastown, PA
1991 Audi 80 quattro (20vt project)
1991 Audi Coupe Quattro (project: my first 20v)
2007 Mitsubishi Raider(Dakota in disguise)
2019 Chevy Cruze RS hatch (wife's little red sporty car)
Noisy Cricket
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH

Re: Aftermarket diverter valves

Post by Noisy Cricket »

Srsly... There's literally been millions of turbo cars produced without them. It's only there so the driver doesn't hear a little chee-chee-chee noise when they let off throttle. (Funny story: I was on the phone with Jonathan a few years ago. I realized he was driving somewhere when his cell phone completely failed to noise-cancel the turbo giggle from the T3 in his XR4Ti as he was upshifting. Ford 2.3 Turbos never had recirc valves)

One of the upgrade mods people in the Volvo community do to the K24-7400 is make the bypass valve spring so stiff that it doesn't do anything... Food for thought.
Pete, that rallycross guy

'06 Volvo S60 R (Swedish GTR)
'84 RX-7 (bridge ported, fuel injected, way modified dirt buggy)
'86 QSW (MC2 goes here. Eventually.)
'81 RX-7 (restoration project)
'73 RX-3 (poor man's Mk2 Escort)
DE80q
Posts: 2572
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:25 am
Location: York PA 17403

Re: Aftermarket diverter valves

Post by DE80q »

Yes, there have been many cars made without them, including the 5000q that my engine came out of. The blow off/diverter valve is mainly put into cars now to increase the life of the turbo. The "giggle" you speak of is the turbo stalling, which causes premature wear on the thrust plate and the bearings in the turbo. The diverter valve can also have the added benefit of helping to keep the turbo spooled up better if the return is aimed properly.
"If you can't find one, make one"

Dallastown, PA
1991 Audi 80 quattro (20vt project)
1991 Audi Coupe Quattro (project: my first 20v)
2007 Mitsubishi Raider(Dakota in disguise)
2019 Chevy Cruze RS hatch (wife's little red sporty car)
Noisy Cricket
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH

Re: Aftermarket diverter valves

Post by Noisy Cricket »

It stalls even with a diverter valve. If anything, the turbo slows down faster with a valve than without, since it is still flowing air and thus is still under load, but there's no exhaust flow to drive it. You can install a turbo tach and see this for yourself.

Turbos are not positive displacement devices. They are dynamic flow devices. Stick your hand over a hair dryer or leaf blower exit and note that the thing will actually speed up instead of load down. No flow means less load, not more.
Pete, that rallycross guy

'06 Volvo S60 R (Swedish GTR)
'84 RX-7 (bridge ported, fuel injected, way modified dirt buggy)
'86 QSW (MC2 goes here. Eventually.)
'81 RX-7 (restoration project)
'73 RX-3 (poor man's Mk2 Escort)
User avatar
88a5tq
Posts: 1553
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 10:27 pm

Re: Aftermarket diverter valves

Post by 88a5tq »

Totally love my 710 from bosche. Handles 30 lbs of pressure, fast-acting diaphragm construction, and zero maintenance. Can make them much louder too by cutting away the "discharge" pipe (and also running a shit loud of boost lol). It's a a dream come true!
1991 Audi 200q Holset
1991 Audi 200q Felbaum'd
1988 Audi 5000 TQ
User avatar
audifreakjim
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:00 pm

Re: Aftermarket diverter valves

Post by audifreakjim »

Noisy Cricket wrote:It stalls even with a diverter valve. If anything, the turbo slows down faster with a valve than without, since it is still flowing air and thus is still under load, but there's no exhaust flow to drive it. You can install a turbo tach and see this for yourself.

Turbos are not positive displacement devices. They are dynamic flow devices. Stick your hand over a hair dryer or leaf blower exit and note that the thing will actually speed up instead of load down. No flow means less load, not more.


Counter-intuitive, but I like it. Might have to play with that :)
User avatar
dana
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 8:54 am

Re: Aftermarket diverter valves

Post by dana »

audifreakjim wrote:
Noisy Cricket wrote:It stalls even with a diverter valve. If anything, the turbo slows down faster with a valve than without, since it is still flowing air and thus is still under load, but there's no exhaust flow to drive it. You can install a turbo tach and see this for yourself.

Turbos are not positive displacement devices. They are dynamic flow devices. Stick your hand over a hair dryer or leaf blower exit and note that the thing will actually speed up instead of load down. No flow means less load, not more.


Counter-intuitive, but I like it. Might have to play with that :)


This makes sense really. Pretty easy to see this effect with centrifugal pumps of any kind. Less load on the shaft when the air is just swirling around inside the housing instead of actually getting pushed out by the blades.
current:
-mk4 tdi wagon with some mods
-TDI b3 90q, holset turbo, be strong little connecting rods!
-the turbo tractor
past:
-11 second 90q junker
-20vt swapped 90q winter beater
-efi 20vt 4kq
-way too many other long gone urs's, 200's 4000's, b5's
User avatar
vt10vt
Posts: 1021
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:44 pm
Location: Winooski, VT

Re: Aftermarket diverter valves

Post by vt10vt »

audifreakjim wrote:
Noisy Cricket wrote:It stalls even with a diverter valve. If anything, the turbo slows down faster with a valve than without, since it is still flowing air and thus is still under load, but there's no exhaust flow to drive it. You can install a turbo tach and see this for yourself.

Turbos are not positive displacement devices. They are dynamic flow devices. Stick your hand over a hair dryer or leaf blower exit and note that the thing will actually speed up instead of load down. No flow means less load, not more.


Counter-intuitive, but I like it. Might have to play with that :)

I'd be really interested to see some data logs with turbo speed :)

I agree regarding compressor stall,f never thought about it, but it makes total sense. However, I think this misses the other benefit of a diverter/blow off which is to avoid excessive pressure spikes. Using the famous 20vt intercooler as a case study, I could pop end tanks at 12psi but with the addition of a valve 20psi was no issue. Obviously we all have welded end tanks these days, but I feel like it could still cause some side effects.
-Shawn C.
2001 S4 6spd Avant blk/blk - stock daily
2002 01E B6 A4 Built FYF, Built 1.8T, HX35 ~330whp
1989 MC-1 200 Avant- MS1 -Gone but will never forget her lessons
1987 5ktq Sedan - Best $500 beater ever
Post Reply