Interesting ignition observation

General automotive discussion
Post Reply
Noisy Cricket
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH

Interesting ignition observation

Post by Noisy Cricket »

Granted, it's a rotary, but internal combustion is internal combustion:

http://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo-rx- ... n-1068028/

Relevant quotes:
"I modified my ignition with a Crane Hi-6 and LX-92 coil per leading coil about a decade ago (ed. note: this means one ignition box per spark plug!) when I had misdiagnosed a power cut out as poor ignition. It turned out to be two separate things, fuel pressure dropping out under boost creep and BOV popping open.

However, when I dyno tune my set up I find it is unlike most people rotaries that make power by "leaning" out the air fuel mixtures. I believe leaning out the AFRs to make power is often a bandaid for poor ignition strength on a rotary."

"1) The tuner was amazed that my engine wanted LESS timing to make peak power at many load points compared to the Haltech conservative base map I use. Less timing= more manifold burn= more boost."

"We found the motor made the most power with the AFRs flatlined below the 10:1AFRs that the 02 sensor could accurately register once the wastegate was open.

Lowering the AFRs had the added benifit of eliminating the boost drop at peak torque and so raising overall power."

"These findings were consistent with my earlier dynapack dyno tuning session where the tuner found no power leaning out the mixture from my street tuned 9-10AFRs except in the 7-8,000rpm range where 10.5:1 made slightly more power."

And finally:

"MSD 6AL: 135 millijoules/spark

Crane Hi-6: 1200 millijoules/spark"
Pete, that rallycross guy

'06 Volvo S60 R (Swedish GTR)
'84 RX-7 (bridge ported, fuel injected, way modified dirt buggy)
'86 QSW (MC2 goes here. Eventually.)
'81 RX-7 (restoration project)
'73 RX-3 (poor man's Mk2 Escort)
User avatar
PRY4SNO
Posts: 2430
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 5:14 pm
Location: Edmonton, AB

Re: Interesting ignition observation

Post by PRY4SNO »

How does this output compare to the LS2 coil conversion units and the 2.0t coils?
Find me on Instagram @pry4sno

|| 2010 Golf Sportwagen TDI /// #farmenwagen
|| 2002 Dodge Ram 2500 24vt 4x4 #bertancummins
|| 1992 80 quattro 20v /// Eventual AAN'd Winter Sled
|| 1990 Coupe quattro /// Because Racecar
User avatar
alxdgr8
Posts: 1056
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:39 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Interesting ignition observation

Post by alxdgr8 »

Some more good reading: http://rennlist.com/forums/944-turbo-an ... ystem.html
A couple of coils are tested/compared in that thread.
-Alex-
@vexartmedia @odd.cylinders @5cylinder_porsche
Odd Cylinders YouTube Page
1992 Porsche 968 (07K transplant in progress)
1983 Aud UrQ (MC1, GT2871R, IIc)
1985 Audi 4kq
2003 Audi S8 (Avus/Oxblood; DD; 6MT swap)
Noisy Cricket
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH

Re: Interesting ignition observation

Post by Noisy Cricket »

PRY4SNO wrote:How does this output compare to the LS2 coil conversion units and the 2.0t coils?


Can't really compare a CDI to normal stuff.

I have always used MSD, a friend of mine put a Hi-6 on his car, and when he was off in Basic he had me go over his car and figure out why it wouldn't run. Okay, we have fuel pump, let's check for spark. Did the old "lay a wire near a ground" thing.

The freakin' coils (multiple coils wired in parallel to ONE box) made big, FAT, white-blue arcs to a chunk of metal four or five inches away.

A rule of thumb with CDI boxes is an amp per thousand RPM. So to put that setup on an Audi, that's five Hi-6 boxes (hey, they're cheap right?) times say 7000rpm = 35 amps average draw.

I don't know what peak current draw is on a Hi-6, but the MSD will pull a hair over 30 amps peak when charging the capacitor for each spark. That is why they want you to connect directly to the battery.
Pete, that rallycross guy

'06 Volvo S60 R (Swedish GTR)
'84 RX-7 (bridge ported, fuel injected, way modified dirt buggy)
'86 QSW (MC2 goes here. Eventually.)
'81 RX-7 (restoration project)
'73 RX-3 (poor man's Mk2 Escort)
Wilford Brimley
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri May 09, 2014 11:52 am

Re: Interesting ignition observation

Post by Wilford Brimley »

Noisy Cricket wrote:And finally:

"MSD 6AL: 135 millijoules/spark

Crane Hi-6: 1200 millijoules/spark"


As posted in the rennlist discussion on page 4:

The Crane rating is a little misleading... It does not produce 1200mJ per spark, rather it does 1200mJ per sequence. From what info I can fine, the energy per spark is around 150mJ. So a little more powerful than the MSD box.
Post Reply